The day I wrote the article titled, “Great trap in FETÖ cases,” Parliament announced the report prepared by the parliamentary commission in charge of investigating the July 15 coup attempt. I have criticisms of the report announced by Commission Chair Reşat Petek, but I need to remind several things first.

But I criticize the fact that a "charity document" that is said to belong to 1967 was mentioned in the report. This is because it is a contribution, even if it is made unknowingly, to the issue in the recent period that I call the great trap. The commission's disclosure of a document, which is said to go back to 1967, is the manifestation of the attempt to add some issues of the pre-Dec. 17/25 period to FETÖ cases and weaken the cases. Notice that this document, rather than the report on which the commission worked for months, preoccupied the public. This is exactly what FETÖ desired.

For God's sake, which one would be more effective in finding FETÖ's political leg? Disclosing the document that shows FETÖ leader Fetullah Gülen helped the Republican People's Party (CHP) in 1967, or questioning where CHP Chairman Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu found illegal fabricated tapes, which he passionately and illegally introduced by saying, “Let us watch them together,” during the party's parliamentary group meeting soon after the Dec. 17/25 period and before the March 29 local elections?