The form of violent action called terror is intended to be used for a specific purpose. It aims to first psychologically and then mentally terrorize what one regards as being an obstacle to actualizing what one claims to be his cause and ideology. It is more dangerous for the target audience to be exposed to a kind of abdication of reason rather than psychological depression. Even if it is against terror, it is possible that the abdication of reason produces a terrorist discourse. In other words, the abdication of reason, which reads the target, causes and methods of terror in the wrong way, indirectly reproduces the environment of terror. The terrorization of cognition and mind shadows the reality and produces a discourse that produces false facts.
6 years ago
Arab Spring rising from the Bosporus
Biden uneasy with Netanyahu after rare public spat
Who forced Iraq into arbitration against Türkiye?
History's paradox: economic and ideological contradictions in global crises
Why R&D spending gives economies a competitive edge
Has the banking crisis been brought under control?