The institutions and individuals, who only accept the authoritative administration mentality as the condition of “the state’s survival”, and turns “the state’s survival ideology” into the indisputable axis of the politics, had never been one of the most radical.

The problem was the political and civilian logistical forces, which create a platform that allows this ideology to re-build itself by means of constantly updating the existing mentality in the name of benefits.

Humanity likes to attribute everything to themselves. They regard fighting in order to confirm their opinion. While doing this, it explains to the people around him that his comments while doing this were representing the right and permanent. However, the world spins fast; changes faster than what humanity assumed or expected…

Haven’t matters like; the change, politics, technology, ethical, life standards, which we had experienced since the 1960s, become more effective, fast and upending than the changes we had experienced in 200 years ?

It’s inevitable that as the world changes it will also change humanity. The human’s explanatory tools and ideological devices becoming meaningless with new data, and the present data being exceeded by new data and discoveries is all inevitable.

Leaving aside the cultural, social, political fields; even in subjects like physics, anthropology and astronomy, the great data of yesterday had been exceeded with today’s discoveries and became the pieces of  science history. History shows us that the information’s attempt to be purified from the period’s ideologies and the story of science are advancing in parallel. This points out that the permanence is an alteration in continuity for the information, and points at the collective quality of the information, which includes centuries, within the alteration eternity.

What is valid for the knowledge and collective one is easily valid for the conjunctural and singular person. Similar to how anything that is valid for quantum physics and physical anthropology is also valid for politics, culture and opinion…

Because of this, the change of a person or his/her opinion, is something natural and even healthy. When we start talking about the change of a person’s opinion, it becomes inevitable to emphasize two separate alteration directions.

One of these directions is the notion, which rejects the totalitarian logic and is dished up from knowledge and change, and the jurisdiction, which is based on these notions, taking the place of the raw ideological reflections.

As for the other direction; it’s the placement of an ideological umbrella, which is suitable to the new period, instead of the post-era’s ideological opinion’s umbrella.

The first one points at liberalization and individualization.

The second one brings the over-politicization along with it.

What are being defended in the first one are the virtues, which are the gains of humanity’s history.

As for the second one; it is the excessive subjects and objects like leader, state and nation.

One is doctrinaire, the other is opportunist….

The first type of alteration is the type of alteration, which is being humiliated with adjectives like so-called enlightened, renegade. For example, the second type, which only consists of putting nationalism in the place of Marxism and putting the government in the place of laborers, is always aggrandized. The most fatal side of this mentality, which jumps from one ideology to another, and imposes an opportunist, selfish and old alteration type, is identifying his own direction change as itself.

This scene is still unchanged for some.

Let us repeat…

Turkey’s important problem at the same time is the political and civilian logistical forces, which prepare a platform for the ideology to re-produce itself by constantly updating the existing mentality in the name of benefit and advantage to some left-wing and conservative types.