As a country, we like short-term small objectives and moves. Our emotions and knowledge are both momentary. Thus, our language and memory feel like they've experienced aphasia. Our records are just like short notes that don't include continuity. The conjunction statements related with these notes are being completed by the people who are almost speaking like Christian fundamentalists. They are trying to pump a mind-boggling thesis like “They have ideological partnership with “ISIL”, that's why they've supported ISIL”. (The ones, who've brought this thesis forwards, were identifying the same rulership circles as mild Islamists in the past.) The comments, which are directed at marginalizing – hatred and made over the “Muslim” name while disregarding that it started from different Islamic segments, about the Salafi movement are registering as the talks of Evangelist Christians.
On the other hand, instead of objective facts, another perception operation is being conducted over the terrorist identification. While anyone involved in violence should be accepted as a terrorist, the terrorists that joined ISIL, and the flower children that joined PKK, are treated as humanists. I guess that they are not being armed to setup gardens in cities and mountains. While the AK Party government, which is being accused of protecting the people joining ISIL “due to the ideological intimacy” with argument of “if we say it a thousand times it might be actualized”, HDP, who is encouraging the participation in PKK, is being presented as a dovish voice while their arming callings are presented as a peace message. By the way, I advise the youngsters, who are throwing themselves to the expectation of having socialism under the control of the U.S., to control themselves.
The connection that is attempted to be established between the organization, which is looking for the infidels within the Muslim world and places them in the middle of their objective center, is the reflection of a mind-boggling perception.
Before anything, first we have to handle the matter of “ideological intimacy” under a different topic. The comments of the people, who doesn't know that the character of the Salafi people is opposite to the Islam understanding in these lands and that their essential targets is some kind of an “Islam”, on Salafism and Salafi people are turning into ignorance conferences.
An organization, like ISIL, that is stuck on the heart of a Muslim geography, this much land, petroleum and power gatherings will never form a situation in countenance of Turkey… In the past, whenever someone declared a statement with the tiniest religious calling, the cliché notions like “bigotry, political reaction, Iranist or Saudi Arabia supporter” would be used. In those years, during the process, which started after US ignited a war with Russia over Afghanistan, the money gathered for the Afghanistan jihad and the jihadists, who went there for aiding, were beneficial and were encouraged. They were useful in US's war against Russia. They were supported as long as they stay like that. Madrasahs were encouraged. According to the evaluation of a Pakistani ex-Ministry of Justice, the US's support in the establishment of 25.000 madrasahs had a big contribution. This neither changed in the Caucus front or Sarajevo… As long as it's coordinative with the Americans' interests, Islamic flows were supported. As the Cold War ended, walls were demolished and socialist bloc became suitable to capitalism, the balances and foe identification started changing. Following the end of Iran-Iraq war, in 1991, US conducted its first maneuver attempt against Iraq. While drawing the route and geography of countries on the “evil axis”, President Bush, who came to power in 2000, was also giving the strategy of the next 20 years.
Bush, who is a firm evangelist, received his evil identification from evangelist Father Graham. Muslim geography was “evil”. Because, Muslims were the reason behind the pains inflicted on His Holiness Jesus. Following the 9/11 milestone, the transformation gathered speed. Chemistry and physical conditions of countries also changed. The policies, which had been summarized with Bush's “Our freedom and life style are under threat” words, changed the fate of many countries. Afghanistan and then Iraq had been invaded.
Due to the bombing attack in a train station in Madrid in 11 March, 2004; 192 people lost their lives. It was before the general elections. In this one week, the progress of the elections changed. In 7 July 2005, a bomb went off in the London subway, and 52 people lost their lives. Europe's multi-culturalism and living together period had been over. Muslims became a potential danger within Europe.
As a result of the US's “war against terror”, the list of countries, whose fates, borders and administrations are changed, are quite a lot; Afghanistan – Iraq – Pakistan – Tunisia – Egypt – Yemen – Libya – Syria – Lebanon… It seems this list will grow bigger.
Iran, who is on the evil axis, got the best of it. Shi'ites in Iraq became the primary force. Today, the agreement with Iran is a step forward. As for Syria; it was on the list of countries that will be entered and crumbled from the inside after Iraq. Turkey seen this process and started the peace process while realizing the filed that will be provided to PKK, which Turkey is fighting against for the past 40 years, and tried to convince Syria to a voluntary democracy. No results were reached.
Instead of reading the happenings chronologically, objectively and as of their results, interpreting them to individual targets are not providing any contribution to a local solution. At the most, it's articulating the Christian fundamentalists' statements. Any pain in this geography is the common pain of us all.
