While not thinking about being a rulership alone or together, MHP and HDP also seem to have shut the doors to entering a coalition. It's being understood that these two parties are pursuing their own political interests and ideological objectives, rather than the interests of the nation and country. They want the other two parties to form a government by forming a coalition, since they know that (or expect that) if this coalition is to happen it will be problematic, both sides in the coalition will tie each other down, things will go bad and the sides in the coalition will be worn out; they are aiming to gather votes for the future by remaining as the opposition.
CHP seems to be keen on forming a government, even if it's with AK Party, because this way they are aiming to ease the reaction of their voter base, save some heads and benefit from the opportunities of the rulership. Again, the interests of the country is not the point in question; because expecting an important and beneficial administration from the government formed by these two parties, which has deep differences in points of view towards the matter of what's bad and harmful or what's good and beneficial for the nation and country, will be nothing more than a dream.
AK Party, somehow or other, is at a position suitable to their specimen. Since a party formed by other parties, while excluding AK Party, will cause great devastation in many fields ranging from bureaucracy to personnel, economy to foreign policies, resolutions to big projects, and from peace to public order, they are fearing (they have to) that this situation will destroy the acquisitions.
In the case that they form a government with the participation of another party or their support from the outside, they think that (which they have to) they will be in a bottleneck of “having the drum on their shoulders, while others hold the mallet" and many of their objectives and projects will be suspended, and thus, due to a day-to-day basis administration, it will be inevitable for them to lose trust and votes.
Even though AK Party believes that it will be to the disadvantage of the country and nation – since the election results made it obligatory – if they harden their hearts, stay away from a coalition, and wait for other parties to form a government, when the early elections comes to the fore, since they will either fail to form the government or since things will become complicated, it's not a far off possibility that they might benefit from entering elections in order to benefit from the benefits provided to the party by that experience.
The readers might have two legitimate questions.
1.Doesn't AK Party have any responsibility, error or fault in this result?
2.Why are you pessimistic about the coalition between other parties or coalitions with AK Party? Why are you making prejudgments, and not taking into consideration the fact that social and political polarizations, which reached dangerous levels, might be like medicine to such a coalition?
I need to write other articles for these legitimate questions and if God permits, I'll do that also.
