|
Don't let many birds be killed with one stone!

According to the information reflected on the press, the Council of Foreign Affairs Minister of the Arab League, which had been gathered at Egypt's Sharm El-Sheikh city, had come to a consent over the draft resolution that foresees the establishment of the “United Arab Army”.



The following is the answer to what this army will do; “The duty of the joint military power, which will swiftly interfere in the case that the safety of member countries or Arab nations are directly threatened, is to urgently interfere to fight against terror and the activities of terrorist organizations, support the activities directed at the preservation of peace, protecting safety, as well as providing the safety of humane aid activities and civilians, and provide the cooperation between the Arab countries on the matter of reciprocal information sharing.”



After stating that the announcement had been made by Sisi, who is staging a coup against democracy, in the name of the union, I'd like to share my concerns.



For many years, the matter of “safety of Arab nations being directly threatened” has been the point in question in Palestine, and recently in Iraq, Syria and Libya. Where were these Arabs before and are these countries in their objective now?



Wasn't it also imperative to make a united move against Sisi, who staged a coup against the President who had been elected through elections? Sisi had slaughtered thousands of innocent Arab communities, imprisoned them, tortured them and he still is. Don't all these make an intervention, or at least the development an antagonist attitude against them, essential? Sisi was in the pursuit for legitimacy and support; he was shuttling between the U.S. and Russia. By carrying out the meeting in Egypt and having Sisi make the announcement, haven't they legitimated and supported the coup?



It's being said that the joint military forces' duty is to “urgently interfere to fight against terror and the activities of terrorist organizations, support the activities directed at the preservation of peace….” According to Sisi and Assad, the Muslim Brotherhood are terrorists. According to Assad, the ones who first requested rights and law without arms, and then, had been mandatorily pushed towards self-defense are terrorists. The ones, who request rights, freedom and democracy in kingdoms and dictator regimes, and, who actualize meetings or make demonstrations without violence, are terrorists and their heads should be stamped out at once.



I'm curious, what's the terrorist definition of “joint military power”?



Unfortunately, I'm starting to smell this unpleasant odor; the Arab Spring had been choked by countries like the U.S., who wanted to conduct modern colonialism in Islam-Arab countries by courtesy of their collaborators, before it was even actualized. However, this case is not yet closed, it's clear that the awakened community will not stop until they reach their objective (until the modern colonialism comes to an end and collaborator administrations are overthrown), and they will continue even if they struggle along the way. The United Arab power will come into play as an obstacle to this legitimate rising and journey.



The only way for me to get rid of my concern is for the united power to identify “terror and terrorist”, announce that they are showing respect to the willpower of the community and human rights and freedoms, and exclude the ones, who are staging coups against legitimate administrations.



Then, do I think this is possible?



No.



Because, the meeting is gathered in Egypt and their spokesmen is the tyrant Sisi.



Then, who caused this formation?



Iran.



The Islam countries' recovery and for them to put an end to being exploited and stop consuming each other is directly related with the following countries forming a union with this intention or act together; Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia.



Whether it's the Saudis or Iran or someone else; as long as they are directed at objectives, which damage the case of leadership, expansion, ideological or sectarian expansionism, and, which serves the purpose of the enemy, the only thing united or segregated powers will do is shed Muslim blood, continue the oppression and waste the capital of Islam.



#United Arab Army
#Irani
#Yemen
9 yıl önce
Don't let many birds be killed with one stone!
The 'tragedy' of US policy vis-a-vis Israel
Achieving energy independence...
Once again, the US didn't surprise anyone!
As conservatism continues to gain strength...
Most sought-after, challenging to recruit, and expected to rise occupations in Türkiye