Look at what the Arab League is doing, then look at what Turkey is doing; which of these is in conformity with the sense of ummah and duty to act in unison against the common enemy?
Who is the common enemy?
The common enemy is the not "big" but "bulky" countries that cannot keep their hands and feet off the other oppressed and suffering people in Muslim countries, that openly colonialize and then disguise this and waste these countries' financial and spiritual assets, give a Bible to the people and take their oil, diamonds and gold, act like so-called apostles of democracy, but support military coups and dictators when their dirty and prohibited aims (interests) are in question; they are satisfied with neither tough or soft Islam or radical Islam and are able to say "let there be materialistic-leftist-racists rather than Islam.
Lately, one of these [Russia] is openly acting as it wishes in Syria with its canons, rifles and troops and supporting Syrian President Bashar Assad, the murderer of hundreds of thousands of people, not the mujahideen representing the Muslim Syrians.
The so-called Muslim Iran, which mentions the unity, solidarity snd brotherhood of the ummah whenever we speak with their scholars snd opinion leaders, is backing Assad in Syria in cooperation with Russia, and they are killing the oppressed and suffering Syrian people together with the Russians. While Russia's presence is relatively covert and indirect, Iran's presence is clear; it is almost running the country.
Meanwhile, the "League" that is still pursuing the cause of Arap people and Arab racism rather than the ummah, gather and reprimand Turkey, not Russia, not Iran, not the other invaders and colonislists. The related news is: "It was announced at the Arab League's extraordinary assembly organized at the foreign ministers level, that the presence of the Turkish Armed Forces on Iraqi territory is condemned. The first article of the final declaration distributed to the press after the assembly, states, 'The Turkish government has been condemned for Turkish troops entering Iraqi territory, its hostile attitude toward Iraq's sovereignty and for posing a threat to the Arabian national security.' The second article of the declaration was a call to the Turkish government to immediately and unconditionally withdraw its forces in Iraq."
At the assembly, Iran was also asked to refrain from intervening in internal affairs, but both the tone used was softer and there is nothing saying, "take your troops, commanders and weapons and leave."
Look at the dire situation: Non-muslim colonialiasts are acting as they wish in Muslim countries by direct participation in the war and killing Muslims (the children of the ummah), turning their countries into ruins, while the Arab League gathers and opposes the Turkish troops there for the ummah, instead of opposing all this and calling the ummah to unity and helping one another. They consider them invaders and want them to move immediately!
Whereas these Turkish troops were sent to Bashiqa in Mosul for the training of peshmerga forces and local groups upon Iraqi President Haider al-Abadi's request for support during his Turkey visit.
These troops were not invaders, they were there because they were called; they were not killing the innocent Muslins, they were there to protect the ummah from the oppression of foreign or deviant invaders.
So, did Turkey have no national interest in this? Of course it did. It was there to secure its borders and prevent its ties to the ummah from being broken. If only "Muslim nations" had also acted with such conscience, then the path to picking itself up for the ummah that was divided into artificial nations would be opened.
