A superb trap was set for Turkey through politics, the media, and capital and through terrorism. This trap, which on the surface was aimed at distancing the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) from power, was actually a plan to prevent Turkey's great transformation, to eliminate the leaders of this transformation, revive the former power structures and once again push the country into a tight spot to make it easy to manage.

There were “short circuit ruling” plans in the works, which is why an expansive front was built. Traditional opposition, the ruling government founding capital circles of the old, the media outlets under their control, organizations that gather power from Turkey's areas of weakness and, finally, terrorist attacks have become elements of this front. The game equating legitimate politics to terrorist attacks was set. This warped and incomprehensible partnership was implemented and whitewashed through the media.

A project of this kind bringing together old coup circles, those who founded then destroyed governments, those acting jointly with the intelligence of many countries to take over the new government's power, and terrorist organizations, is a first in Turkey's political history.

They used the Kurdish and Alevi identities as a tool for blackmail and fear. They threatened us all. The confused our minds to a point where we couldn't determine what to believe. They weren't the ones who set the game. They won tenders, some would do work upon instruction, but the plan was Turkey.

This is why I have been emphasizing “intellectual terror” for days. I am trying to make a warning, a call. Whereas, “intellectual terror” is only one element of the great front and a service to whitewash that big sin.

Afterwards, there is the “political incapacity” problem that needs to be questioned in detail and resisted no less than intellectual terror methods. You may also call this “political impotence.” Right after it there is the will and power plans of a power bloc that is the master game planner of these two threats and is composed of certain capital groups, activated against the nation's will. You may call these the “internal invaders.”

The betrayal of those capital groups, the tenders they won, the “internal invasion” and “short circuit ruling” they attempted in exchange for these tenders should be taken into serious consideration, questioned and condemned in consciences. The public opinion should be warned of the type of traps set for Turkey's future.

Finally, there is a will distributing tenders to them all, a will that is shaping and managing the front both within and outside Turkey. This will is the one that destroyed the Ottoman Empire's political authority, divided the geography in World War I and confined Turkey into Anatolia for the last century.

This is the real threat. This threat is playing a civil intervention scenario, similar to the Egypt example, to stop the rising Turkey. The scenario is the same as the destructive threat aimed at the Ottoman Empire in World War I; there is no difference between the two in terms of quality.

It is the same will that has today activated the fault lines of the region, divided countries based on terrorist organizations, replaced governments with terrorist organizations and is trying to carry the regional wind of chaos all the way inside Turkey. The disintegration and destruction project that has been ongoing since the 1991 Gulf War and has taken many countries under its influence has currently reached Turkey's borders. Right at this moment, political plots on the inside and plans to put the system into a deadlock, feeding one another with this threat, are quite serious.

There is a direct relationship between intellectual anger and incapacity, and political incapacity and internal invasion. And part of this which makes one say, “this is too much,” is that this domestic element has armed itself with terror's weapons.

The unwillingness of those with an authority whose legitimacy cannot be questioned, to manage the government, their incompetence, little plans, and now, serious political incapacity, have taken on the form of bad intentions and, in fact, a state of danger. Let alone questioning the plans behind this bad intention, it reveals the truth that those political parties lack the skills required to produce anything or manage Turkey, their inability to place anything in front of the country that will surpass the ruling party as well as the truth of exhaustion. They started displaying incredible irresponsibility like pushing the country into a deadlock, forcing it to chaos in order to remove the AK Party from power, sacrificing, taking out their anger from their voters.

The fact that intellectuals are unable to produce ideas, they get suffocated in unfruitful conflicts, act to take revenge and the same behavioral disorder is apparent in political figures, while both circles feed one another in this sense. None of them have the responsibility or skills to guide the other, to suggest a solution. Hence, politics, the traditional opposition are rapidly losing power.

Although currently they are continuing their existence through anger and clashes, as well as by provoking enmity towards Erdoğan and the AK Party, after a while they will see that these will remain ineffective, unbelievable, and fail to cause an echo in the public opinion.

Personal revenge and expectations have been taken very much beyond the interests of the country, threatening the peace and future of the country. The traditional opposition circles that failed to renew themselves and produce a new political discourse and project are those most responsible in terrorist organizations taking the load off of the opposition.

The image of those sent to Parliament by election, political parties founded to manage the country, running away from political responsibility, managing the country, is beyond a flaw that can be camouflaged with anger towards Erdoğan.

Despite this state of conflict, the AK Party, which garnered 41 percent of the vote, fulfilled its political responsibility, passed on their requests to form a government, and avoided entering any coalition and managing the country. The AK Party asked them all for the caretaker government, yet still they said “no.” They specifically blocked those who were receiving offers for the Cabinet and started lynching campaigns against those accepting the offer.

They played a game. They planned to give the image of an AK Party-HDP caretaker government so they could go to the elections with that image. Whereas, none of them were aware that based on their positions, they were actually all on the same front. We let the HDP be, and once again they displayed an example of political blindness; they were unable to understand that based on position, they are in the same front as the PKK.

This nation will not forgive those who leave the country in a tight spot, those who attempt to disregard them for their own personal desires. They will shut up those who have no contribution to the responsibility of managing with any formula whatsoever. In the present case, the AK Party is striving to save the country from this dead end, while they are trying to deepen it even further.

Such a position would be taken only in the expectation of a coup, or to prepare for some extraordinary condition we are unaware of, or because action is taken based on the instructions of the game planners we mentioned above, referred to as the “superior mind.”

The image of orders is predominant. At least that's how the picture looks. It needs to be mentioned that those who say “no” to everything have a serious lack of the political mind. An opposition party is required to suggest a political discourse and projects that are much stronger than that of the ruling party. Whereas the suggestions made by these parties is at least a century behind the discourse of the AK Party.

Unless they are able to renew themselves, they may be replaced by other political formations. All of these parties may lose power in the medium-term. Their attitude today, adjusted to reject to being the ruling party, is an example of incapacity much beyond the weakness of political discourse.

Managing politics, parties and forming ruling parties through orders was valid 20 years ago.

I define “internal invaders,” “intellectual terror” and “political impotence” as the three great dangers. I personally believe that those trying to tune Turkey through these three threats will be the first sacrifices. Turkey is going to resist, strengthen its position, increase its power, but they are the ones to fall into the well that had originally been dug for Turkey. They are already down. The CHP, MHP, HDP, the parallel structure, the PKK, DHKP-C, among many other legitimate or non-legitimate structures, took place in the same front “based on their position.” Is there any other picture frame that is more serious than this?