"We are facing the account settlings of the century," said Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu. This sentence he used upon starting the meeting with the Newpapers' Editors-in-Chief at the Dolmabahçe Palace the other day caused my eyes to sparkle.

The name of the first book I published was "The century-old Siege", while the second one was called "The century-old Reckoning." I believe in an invasion project which is directed against the region, and is in the dimension of World War I; this is a siege. On the other hand, reckoning reflected the pursuit of the local dynamics of the region to defend itself and settle the account with invading projects. I was thinking of naming the third book "Victory of the century."

This is precisely why I use the expression the Last War of Independence. This is exactly why I think what we are going through is the second plot following World War I, and that we are waging a struggle for independence for the first time after a century.

While listening to Davutoğlu, I saw that those -including myself- who act in line with the region's historical stance have the same concerns, and the same goals. Therefore, I realized that the way I was interpreting what is going on in the region in the past decade has been correct to a great extent.

The pieces I recently wrote regarding interference to the Northern Region, pieces entitled "inner occupation," pieces written towards the fact that an anti-Turkey front is being formed through Kurdish nationalism and Alevism, and reproaches such as "you won't even be able to intervene when the borders change" were because of this reason.

All my pieces written towards explaining the fact that the Aydın Doğan group is carrying out the marketing process of this malicious front was never personal. Let me note that I will write more on this issue, and discuss how this group nurtures structures that fight Turkey.

Because they got the greatest tender of the anti-Turkey front -which is mostly shaped by organizations. People started to die every time the Selahattin Demirtaş that they marketed spoke. The structures that they guard declared war on Turkey and refrain from criticizing those structures, and demonstrate a hypocritical stance.

The topics of the talk with Davutoğlu were the latest terrorist attacks and the operations carried out inside and outside. Turkey was attacking three separate terrorist groups in two different lines and in doing this was carrying out extensive operations inside. The operation against these three fronts was actually a single operation, but a tremendous coordination was drawing attention.

I had not witnessed such an organization like this before. Because some were collecting terrorist organizations such as the PKK, DHKP-C, ISIL and MLKP under a single roof. Therefore, it was a matter of "a state of self-defense" for Turkey. I call this "defense of the homeland." If the issue at stake is the homeland, then I am of the opinion that all political fronts that we are a part of are just a detail. Therefore, I believe that it is crucial for everyone to determine the place and position without any hesitance in this period of self-defense.

While explaining Turkey's position, explaining what Turkey is struggling with and what type of threats and attacks Turkey is exposed to, the Prime Minister was conducting quite a deep regional analysis, beyond the scope of the daily flow of information. I believe that this prudence, and this rich historical information that became an opportunity for Turkey is the mortar that determines the position of our country, and its wealth.

This is no longer the period of viewing this country through daily tactics, gossip, irresponsible words and actions. This is why I say the traditional opposition of Turkey cannot govern such a country and that they do not have such skills and depth. Davutoğlu was actually giving clues about the reflection of map drafts -on Turkey- directed against the region as a whole. He was making us feel that it is not possible to identify threats, take prevention without reading these and no longer possible to be satisfied about Turkey's future without comprehending these. The tactics to destroy the Ottoman Empire are now being implemented on Turkey.

Davutoğlu was stating that the Salafi Movement which emerged in the Saudi region had resulted in a regional breakup, and that a similar fraction was taking place through religious identities. A tutelage was established through the actors seen after the June 7 elections, and that they aim to establish a tutelage again by creating chaos and uncertainty in Turkey, and that because of this they try to pull the country into a deep spiral of violence, and wanted to give the impression that even the law enforcement officials could not assure their own safety and security.

Saying that they wanted to push the Alevis during the Gezi Park incident, and the Kurds during the October 6-7 incidents to the streets, and that the DHKP-C has opened camps in Qandil mountains because of this, Davutoğlu pointed that a religious fraction was created through Salafism, ethnic fraction was created through Bulgarian nationalism, and local fractions through Janissaries and Bektashism.

History was repeating itself. From what I understand, those who fought against the Ottoman Empire and attempted to destroy it back then were using the same methods against Turkey today!

"Compassion without power is incompetence, while power without compassion is oppression. Some saw our compassionate face and tried to test our power," he says, and adds, "They opened Turkey's existence as a state, and legitimacy to debate." He says that they are attempting to establish a "new parallel state" in the Southeast. He says that the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) is now carrying out the unresolved murders, and that they want to turn the situation in the country into the 1990s.

Davutoğlu says, "If there is no public order, then there is no freedom." He notes that they carried out three dimensional operations rather than single dimensions, that they mobilized against the Gezi and Oct. 6-7 preparations, and that they broke the ceasefire and commenced the attacks.

He states that the three-dimensional operations received intensive support from the inside and outside, and that they received a lot of support from the Southeast, and that there was an attack against Turkish democracy and that they want to eliminate this attack, and that if the PYD was to adopt a stance that will disturb Turkey, they will also carry out the same intervention to the former.

He says that the operation was so unexpectedly fast and effective that nobody could have estimated.

These are details about the operation. But there is another operation above all of these operations and that aims to paralyze the country. With this goal, they want to stir the state mind of Turkey, limit its power, make it kneel, and poison the public opinion through plots inside. While doing this, they make alliances with the most extreme terrorist organizations, nurture them and release them to the market, carry out a war against Turkey.

Where everyone stays in this war is critical. You should know that nothing is concealed, and camouflaged anymore, and that it is no longer possible to hide behind fancy words. If you make alliances with terrorist organizations after saying, "We are on the side of democracy and freedom, we struggle for this," and market terrorist organizations, play with PKK and DHKP-C, you will be left bare-naked.

At that time, this nation will hold you accountable for the blood that is shed. Turkey is the only place during this grand account settling. Because there is a concealed war being carried out against our country. When everything is so clear, it is explicitly treacherous to lay an ambush in other fronts. The end of treason means perishing.