The drama of the “screen fellowship,” who have not been able to comprehend the November 1 election results, are trying to solve the puzzle by sociology. Last week, they were holding Devlet Bahçeli responsible for the AK Party's 50-percent achievement, and were butchering him on screen. Bahçeli did not take this lying down. He stumped them through Twitter saying, “ In spite of all of you, I am going to continue on my journey, you scapegraces.” This party calmed down a little after this.

This week the fellowship (including the Gülen movement) are tearing into the CHP. Columnists and television commentators have finally managed to stir the party by declaring Kılıçdaroğlu a 'clumsy and ineffective chairman.' Three candidates are running for general presidency of the party. Wonderful! With so many candidates, it is clear why the party has been unsuccessful. Obviously, everyone worked for himself or herself during the election marathon.

The CHP has lost six elections with Kılıçdaroğlu. Four years from now, three elections will take place at the same time: local, general and Presidential elections. If they lose these, too, that makes nine elections. Round that off to 10 from now as, Muharrem Ince, a candidate, said, “If the AK Party goes to a referendum, they are sure to win,” which means they have admitted the fourth defeat from now.

It is argued that, if they remove Kılıçdaroğlu, for example, and make Muharrem Ince, who said, “ If AK Party gains 49 percent of the votes, I will leave politics and start to feed chickens,” the leader, then the CHP is bound to win. Or, if Umut Oran, the Mr. Spock of the Parallel Universe, sits in the driver's seat, then the CHP will win the Star Wars. We haven't heard the other arguments yet, but surely something will win.

In brief, being declared the culprit, if Kılıçdaroğlu goes, and a new general president replaces him, CHP's votes will increase, and the AK Party's votes will drop, and then the CHP will come to power, Turkey will change, and so will the world, and then the galaxy will change too... this is what Muharrem Ince was going on about, but I missed the rest. His supporters saw that they would come to power, so they were happily laughing away.

'AK Party was supposed to lose, but why didn't they!?'

Please do not laugh, we will explain the situation to you: The television fellowship, which couldn't comprehend the situation after the November 1 elections, couldn't find a solution because they didn't ask the right question. They are asking, “AK Party was sure to lose the election, but why didn't they?” They are running into a stonewall, because they have been asking the question incorrectly.

'Why didn't the AK Party lose the elections? Because, Bahçeli said 'no' to everything, AK Party didn't lose.' 'Why didn't the AK Party lose the elections? 'They didn't lose because Kılıçdaroğlu was clumsy.' Now do you understand what all the confusion is about? They are asking the question, and answering themselves. And then they fall into depression because they aren't content with the answer. Then the poor leaders are butchered.

If you were to ask, ' What is the right question?', they actually know what the real question is. But, they know that if they were to ask the right question, the saw blade would turn on them. For example, if the ' Troll academic from Boğaziçi' who says, “ I am a methodology and statistics specialist; if the AK Party gets 45 percent of the votes, I will quit my job,” asks the right question, his level will come out in his answer. And then, like a car producer recalls defective cars, Boğaziçi University will then have to recall all his students! (I think Boğaziçi should offer a lecturer position to the guy who made this joke on social media; obviously he is smarter.)

Those who don't want to tire themselves aren't asking the right questions. As, if they asked the right question, “ How did the AK Party win, what was our mistake?” they will be deprived of their roles as party general president, columnist, editorial director, television commentator, and lecturer. Criticizing others is the easiest way out.

Meanwhile, no one seems to be battering the HDP co-president Selahattin Demirtaş, although he was just as unsuccessful as Bahçeli and Kılıçdaroğlu. Why aren't they criticizing him? There are weak adumbrations, but no one on screen is butchering him. I wonder if it is because they are scared the saw blade will turn on them? Let's wait and see if they will butcher Demirtaş and Figen Yüksekdağ like they did to Bahçeli. I am waiting to find out. Let's hope they do before winter is over.

You write about what's happening in the opposition, and it turns out to be a humor article! Don't laugh, it might just happen to you.