The events in Paris can be linked to the children of the Maghreb reacting to French arrogance and discrimination.
It could be called a form of social and cultural explosion.
At the end of the day we are talking about a country where even Zinedine Zidane, a footballer of Algerian descent who won France a World Cup and rates among the top three to five footballers in the history of the game, doesn’t feel like a first-class citizen; and was never elevated to the levels that Michel Francois Platini was.
A country where discrepancies prevail to the extent that while the most obscene insults to Islam and sacred values are classified as “freedom of expression;” the book “Zionism Files” (title of its Turkish translation) by the great French philosopher Roger Garaudy is banned.
Naturally…
In no way do all these, and even far worse, acts constitute a reason to take a person’s life and, even worse, commit terrorism.
Our value judgment is: Anyone who calls themselves“human” needs to oppose terrorism regardless of the race or religious belief of the perpetrator and the reasons for it.
We should distinguish between a climate that promotes terror, and the creation of a climate on the basis of terror.
The question needs to be phrased properly:
The question of who the perpetrator is belongs to the field of criminology. The question that will provide us with the answer though is “who stands to gain what on the basis of terror.”
***
You must be aware that the terrorist state of Israel was very disturbed after France too recognized Palestine as an independent state, in the wake of Sweden, Ireland, Spain and the Netherlands.
Disturbed to the extent that Benjamin Netanyahu -- who called the decision by France a “major mistake” -- said, “Requests are made from various quarters in Europe that Israel make concessions on some issues. However, the making of these concessions in question would create a threat not just for Israel but for Europe as well…”
It showed the European public what kind of threat it was with the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
Additionally…
The overruling of the European Union’s decision to keep Hamas on the list of terrorist organizations by the European Court of Justice made the Racist Zionist network very uncomfortable.
Our very own parallel friends, who are the local Islamophobic charlatans, got to pose the question they so desired to U.S. State Department Spokesperson Jen Psaki. (The term parallel structure is used to refer to the Fethullah Gülen-led movement.)
Which question?
This one: “Does the visit of Khaled Mashal, the political bureau chief of Hamas, to Ankara carry the risk of Turkey finding itself placed on the list of states sponsoring terrorism?...”
Yes, they were even able to ask this calamitous question in broad daylight.
Is the reason for the atrocious attack on the MİT (National Intelligence Organization) trucks now clear?
Is it now clear which project was being furthered through the leak of the contents of a secret meeting of our Foreign Ministry?
Are the reasons now clear regarding the intentions to depict Turkey as a country that aids terrorism, in the English-language newspapers belonging to the parallel team?
Can the dreadful and dark side of those working toward preparing the grounds for Turkey’s occupation now be seen?
***
The movie “La haine” by Mathieu Kassovitz, which was released in 1995, explains the resentment felt by three migrant youth in the suburbs of Paris toward French discrimination.
A man, while falling off a building, says: “Everything’s alright so far, everything’s alright so far, everything’s alright so far, I am at the 25th floor and everything’s alright so far…”
The narrator’s voice during the scene says: “What matters is not the fall but the moment of touching ground…”
Actually, Samuel Huntington’s masterpiece “The Clash of Civilizations” provided both the design and portended the “fall” planned for civilizations.
The fall began with the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Remember that former U.S. President George Bush chirped the word “crusade” in the wake of that attack.
***
Before all else, the Western public had to be prepared i.e. convinced of postmodern crusades.
Islamophobia was the lever for this, and Al-Qaeda and ISIL the fuel.
The West, while consolidating public opinion on the basis of these terrorist organizations, was tearing the East (mentally and geographically) to shreds.
To the extent that ethnicities and sects were completely stopped being different designs on the same rug, and everyone was pitted against each other. Just like Henry Kissinger had said after the attack of Sept. 11 that “From now on the clash should be amongst Muslims…”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was one of those who had recognized the situation. “The West should not try to divide the Islamic world… It should give up on pitting Muslims against one another…,” he had said.
***
France had opposed the occupation of Iraq at the time. In recent days France’s policies on Syria were very close to those of Turkey.
It had started moving in line with Russia and Turkey in the field of energy as well.
Additionally, the French public was not really contributing to Pegida (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West), which was spreading through Europe after taking off in Germany.
Our very own excellent charlatans are applauding the preparations for this global fall i.e. the postmodern crusades, in the hope that the AK Parti (Justice and Development Party) falls too.
Pity; they are such idiots that they believe they will be excluded from this global “fall.”
