During the past autumn, when the cram school arguments had kicked up the dust, I had written articles that were stating that this obstinacy would not end nicely.

It seems that the December 17-25 operations were in the bag and the schoolroom issue was only the beginning of everything.

Ultimately, in those articles I was emphasizing that the end of the arguments will be abided by the state’s decision.

Also, during the October 6-8 incidents, I had tried to explain that the things that had been done and the persistence would not be ending nicely for anyone.

Today, even though the violence we had experienced then had decreased in a vast scale, its residue had subsided; the tension in the relations is still continuing at an unclear level. We are trying to advance in the process, where we cannot make out when, where and how it will crack again.

Besides, this time, an awareness, experience and perception, which will be formed in time like we had experienced in the Parallel Structure, is not the point in question; the state’s sensitivity against terrorism and the state’s practice of struggling possesses a stationary and settled historicity.

In this manner, whenever something is experienced, the answer in return is stern and rapid at the same rate.

The grey weather we had entered will also make it easier for this to be more rapid and stern.

The power, which the sides in the classroom arguments had trusted in, had been understood in a short time, and today this power had been liquidated in a certain level. It is also clear that the liquidation process will be continuous and also will continue for a long time.

The power, which the ones who had caused the October 6-8 incidents via Kobane are trusting in, was also known for the past 35 years; it is an armed organization.

The thing that obligated me to write on this matter is the blindness of the people who don’t want to see the other side of the medallion.

As for the other side of the medallion, it is where the experience of the state is.

Besides, this experience is even older than 35 years.

It is institutionally keeping the military, police force, politicians, civilian bureaucrats, diplomats and the anomalous war methods, which it had been encountering maybe since the Balkan times in the 19th century, in mind.

For many times, it had seen how the international relations, connections had scratched an irrelevant problem within itself.

Many examples, like the Mosul issue and how the Bulgarian issue had been unjustly labeled on us as a “massacre” because of the Ottoman debentures losing their value in Britain, are still remembered. Thereby, even though when one is rightful in doing something, factors like its timing, method, connections, coinciding with other issues, overlapping with international interests, are all designating the result and how it will be perceived and how it will be reciprocated in return. It is not possible to forget what the countries in the middle of this like Iraq and Syria suffered for 12 years and 4 years consecutively. First, look at the charts of any research establishment, which shows the power equilibriums in the Syrian lands as a map, then think about it in Turkey.

Let me say the stereotyped statement that could be said lastly; at the end of all this if there is an objective to  establishing a Kurdistan region inside the borders of the Republic of Turkey, then, this will never happen. In this country, the Turkish and Kurdish will continue living together without drawing lines between themselves.

However, the outcome of forcing something that will not happen is quite clear; during this enforcement, everyone, Turkish, Kurdish will lose. We’ll all lose.

However, if the real objection is dropping arms and topics like Öcalan’s condition, mother language, and equal citizenship, then it is clear that the things we are experiencing and the statements that are made are hurting all these objectives.

Sometimes, some things do change; however, when observing this from the outside, this won’t be distinguished; similar to how the antelope, which had been shot with a poison dart, continues to run and deceive us for a short-while.

Actually, because of its sturdy crust, the dried walnut will not show this decay.

For example, the Constitution Commission will work, work, and work for 2 years. Ultimately, even those simple clauses they had worked over will not become a law…

As for the Resolution Process, if the state of affairs go on like this, then it will become titular.

Who will be happy about this?