The U.S. is presently under the control of Evangelical extremism, which is a different version of the Muslim world’s Daesh. This mentality is quite in harmony with the Zionist-led Israel – which has the same mentality – but is at odds with all the other segments of the world and is thus dragging both U.S. politics and the world into a complete disaster. They make all preferences in their international relations based on a Zionist interpretation of the Holy Testament.
This program is the only thing the Barack Obama administration took into account when unilaterally cancelling the years-long negotiation process with Iran, which was finely worked in accordance with extremely rational-strategic and diplomacy practices. This program pleases Israel in the short term, but it is also a program that will lead to Israel's disaster in the long term. It is predicted that as a result of the implementation of this program, which will drag the region to an Armageddon war, step-by-step, there will be no more state called Israel or no more nation called Jews.
In my last article, I had presented a section from a documentary about American Evangelist extremist Christians that was run on Germany's top state television channel Das Erste once upon a time. It could be very clearly seen that the invasion of Iraq, which led to the savage massacre of more than one million people and the complete loss of peace and stability in the country and the loss of people's trust in one another, was being carried out within the frame of an Evangelist plan.
The way the Evangelist extremist Christians, who found an area for their operations in Iraq during the invasion, view the Muslim Iraqis through their missionary activities is enough to terrify one. The life, dignity and honor of the Muslim Iraqi has no significance at all. They act upon a crusader mindset that does not consider those who are not one of them, those who do not serve them as humans anyway. This mindset was in power back then as it is today and is putting new plans to create further chaos in the Middle East into action.
The plan is actually very clear. It is impossible for Israel to invade the Middle East or the lands it fantasizes to be promised to itself, to have sovereignty over them with its current population and state. But it is believed that preventing strong administrations on these lands and weakening the existing administrations will automatically give control to Israel in the region. This is the current plan that is being implemented step-by-step.
The matter is much beyond Israel's security. The matter is Israel's domination. Thus, just as this U.S. administration has never been after stability in Iraq, the same applies to Syria. It is not concerned about fighting Daesh or terrorism either. Had it been concerned, its course was quite obvious. Eliminating all forms of terrorism is possible in a few months if the approach is sincere. The real source of the problem there, as well as its incidental source, is very obvious. When tackled with honesty, it is not difficult at all to reach a result within the scope of quite a clear and simple plan, but if only the claim that the U.S. really wants to eliminate Daesh and all other terrorist organizations is true.
We have always said that Daesh is quite foreign to the culture, faith and history of the region based on its discourse, violence and anti-humanity style. But there is something common in a movement that is so foreign: Evangelical extremism and Zionist occupation that has started to take root in the region with the invasion of Iraq. It is not difficult to trace the genealogy of Daesh, which has shed the blood of none other than the Muslims, all the way to these two understandings.
The U.S.'s well-known legendary foreign policy has surrendered to this religious mindset. Now, if you like, let's ask the famous foreign policy question once more for the U.S.:
What is important in foreign policy, interests or ideals?
Is it not clear enough that the current U.S. policy does not serve its own interests? While a country that has the U.S.'s means and power has the chance to be unrivaled and ahead in every aspect in today's world, what might it be getting out of acting with an irrationality that is not in parallel with that strength or those means?
For example, what might the U.S., which has become an object of hatred throughout the world due to its current policies, be gaining that is worth all this animosity?
The U.S. is a country that has no positive image in the world other than the acceptance that it is "powerful." Other than that, it is a country that is seen as the perpetrator of all kinds of plots, injustices, massacres, conspiracies, military or non-military coups, theft and imperialism. The image of a country whose friendship cannot be trusted, whose enmity is ruthless is being engraved more deeply in memories by the current U.S. administration.
Just look at what the U.S. has gained from declaring Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Or, what it has gained through the support it has provided to the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)-affiliated Democratic Union Party (PYD) in Syria, a terrorist force against Turkey, its NATO ally and strategic partner in the region. What kind of a strategy, what kind of an international level of relations and what kind of a foreign policy is this? Where is logic in any of this?
The U.S., which is known to be involved in all the coups in Turkey, could not hide its role in the July 15, 2016 coup attempt even if it wanted to. It failed to hide it during the coup, but it made it really obvious when it insisted on protecting the Fetullah Terrorist Organization's (FETÖ) head Fetullah Gülen and its elements. The more it revealed this the more it lost its good faith in the eyes of the Turkish people. And now, it almost tried to send a diplomatic message through Twitter for the immediate release of U.S. Pastor Andrew Brunson, who has been found to have a connection to the PKK and FETÖ and is being tried by the Turkish judiciary. The way this was expressed by Vice President Mike Pence, a strict Evangelist, shows that the mind controlling the U.S. perceives the situation as completely religious.
It is quite clear that such a mentality controlling the U.S. at this time will have no benefit to neither the U.S. nor the world.
If Pastor Brunson's trial result becomes clear at this stage, would it not be more appropriate for those who are so blatantly protecting him get ready to answer for their share of the crime?
