|
Whose border will NATO protect and against whom?
We are watching a very dangerous scene from the game the U.S. is playing in Syria that is aimed at pushing the entire region to instability. After presenting the Daesh terror organization as the world’s biggest threat ever for some time now, it has turned eliminating this threat as an advance and unlimited source of credit for all sorts of activities, alliances and massacres.


For this purpose, it generously armed the Democratic Union Party (PYD), which is another terrorist organization, and provided it with all kinds of support. When doing this, it ignored all the warnings made by Turkey, a NATO ally, which, until now, it declared a strategic partner in all its Middle East policies.


The PYD is one and the same as the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which has been carrying out hostile terrorist activity against Turkey for years – it is its offshoot in Syria with a different name. The U.S. not being aware of this is out of the question, furthermore, when necessary, it admits it too. However, it uses the Daesh threat as its excuse for the cooperation with the PYD, yet this excuse is even extremely far from being convincing.


The real causality relationship in this cooperation has increasingly become clear: The Daesh threat was created and processed by the U.S. to open room for the PYD, to heroize it and turn it into a pawn-actor. As a matter of fact, the nature of the relationship between the PYD, Daesh and the U.S. on the ground could not be rationalized in any other way.


Despite there being no more Daesh threat left in Syria, or despite it being largely eliminated, according to official U.S. documents, it was announced that it is going to get the PYD, the affiliate of the PKK – which is recognized as a terrorist organization – to establish a 30,000-strong border protection force.


It is obvious that the U.S. is not confused at all about why and against whom it is going to establish this force. Except, it hid this from its own allies and the legitimate actors of the region and from those that thought it was a friend. Otherwise, what logic can there be behind the U.S., as a NATO member, deploying a force that is Turkey’s enemy on Turkey’s border, another NATO member?


At yesterday’s Justice and Development Party (AK Party) group meeting, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan rightfully noted that the U.S.’s priority as a NATO member is to protect a NATO member’s borders. Yet, if, through this action, it is personally threatening the borders of a NATO-member country, what significance does NATO have? Upon this, Erdoğan addresses NATO rather than the U.S. and says, “Oh NATO! You are obliged to take a stance against those who violate the borders of your partners. What kind of attitude have you taken until now? We have informed them of this and continue to inform them. Our chief of General Staff is discussing this matter with them and will continue to discuss it.”


The reality of it is that, under article four of the NATO agreement, in the case that national security, border integrity or independence of a member country is under danger, that country can call the other countries to assemble for consultation. Because a member’s national security, border integrity or independence concerns all other member countries, it is considered as a threat toward their national security, their integrity as well. Article 5 of the agreement requires an attack against a member country to be considered an attack against all member countries.


Frankly, the reason why the U.S. is resorting to such a dangerous adventure that is leading it to disregard all its standards on terrorism, its values and measures and lose all its friends needs to be analyzed correctly. If the U.S. is getting out of this adventure by losing all the values and legal acquis that make America what it is, it must be expecting something in return. Since it’s all about gains in international relations, what kind of a gain does the U.S. have in this? If there is anybody who can think on behalf of the U.S. and work out its gain in all this, please come forward.


The only explanation to this dangerous adventure, which is far from all kinds of rationality and gain in terms of the U.S., is that the U.S. sees all this as subject to a bigoted understanding of religious history. It is obvious that it is step by step implementing  a Zionist program that will occupy a geography spanning the Nile and Euphrates. In this program, it sees the Kurds within the PYD-PKK organization as an element that it can use to carry out its program and serve them.


 Their actions in Turkey or Syria to date gain a different kind of significance within this strategic integrity. For them, Kurds’ salvation or the Kurdish identity bears no importance, what matters is the role they have been given within this Zionist program.


Those who have cast this role are obvious. Up until now, this program has not been staged as perfectly as they wanted. It will not be happening after now either. Whatever plan they have on their minds, right now, they have a Turkey that is ruining it all and leading them to revise each step, dropping their masks one by one and disgracing them each time they revise it.


Turkey is going to continue to prevent them from implementing their plans. If they are ready to commit suicide, nobody is going to care about their life.


 

 

 

 

 
#NATO
#Turkey
#PKK
6 years ago
Whose border will NATO protect and against whom?
Can Daesh save Israel?
Is World War III about to break out?
Demographic shift in Türkiye...
The real war is being waged on social media platforms...
A call to the wealthy...